When Funders Ask for Impact but Won’t Fund Infrastructure

Dear funders and fund seekers,

Let’s name the disconnect plainly:

  • Philanthropy loves outcomes.

  • Philanthropy loves innovation.

  • Philanthropy loves transformation.

But too often, philanthropy refuses to fund the very infrastructure required to make any of those things possible.

Especially when it comes to Queer organizations, Trans-led work, BIMPOC-led nonprofits, and community-based initiatives operating closest to harm and need, funders continue to demand impact without investment.

And the math simply does not work.

Impact Is Built on Infrastructure, Not Good Intentions

You cannot scale programs without staff. You cannot steward donors without systems. You cannot innovate when your executive director is covering payroll, writing grants, running programs, and answering the hotline.

Yet funders routinely ask organizations to:

  • Show exponential growth year over year

  • Produce sophisticated data and evaluation

  • Expand reach, deepen outcomes, and diversify funding

  • “Do more with less”

…while refusing to fund:

  • Salaries at market rates

  • Administrative capacity

  • Technology and systems

  • Leadership development

  • Fundraising infrastructure

  • General operating support

This isn’t strategy. It’s extraction.

The Quiet Hypocrisy of “We Don’t Fund Overhead”

Let’s be clear: overhead is not a dirty word.

It’s rent.
It’s payroll.
It’s insurance.
It’s compliance.
It’s the CRM that tracks donor trust.
It’s the development staff ensuring sustainability.

When funders say, “We don’t fund overhead,” what they’re often saying is: We want the outcomes without responsibility for the conditions that produce them.

That mindset disproportionately harms Queer organizations and other historically underfunded groups, because we are already operating with fewer reserves, thinner margins, and less inherited wealth to buffer shortfalls.

Restricted Funding Is Choking the Work

Project-only funding assumes organizations exist in a vacuum. But real work doesn’t happen in neat, isolated silos.

Queer communities don’t experience:

  • Housing instability separately from healthcare

  • Mental health separately from safety

  • Economic insecurity separately from identity

Yet nonprofits are expected to contort their work into hyper-specific grant categories that don’t reflect lived reality, then absorb the operational costs quietly and invisibly.

That burden lands on staff. On leaders. On the most marginalized people inside the organization.

If You Want Innovation, Fund Stability

Here’s the truth philanthropy needs to sit with: Innovation requires slack. Time. Capacity. Room to think. Space to rest.

Organizations in survival mode cannot:

  • Experiment responsibly

  • Invest in leadership pipelines

  • Build long-term donor relationships

  • Collaborate across movements

  • Imagine beyond the next funding cliff

When funders refuse to invest in infrastructure, they actively prevent the innovation they claim to value.

Accountability Check for Funders

If you’re a funder reading this, ask yourself honestly:

  • Do we fund general operating support?

  • Do we offer multi-year commitments?

  • Do we trust organizations to allocate resources where they’re most needed?

  • Do we fund leadership, not just programs?

  • Do our reporting requirements reflect partnership or policing?

If the answer to most of these is no, then the issue isn’t nonprofit capacity. It’s philanthropic practice.

What Real Support Looks Like

Funders serious about impact must be willing to:

  • Fund unrestricted, flexible dollars

  • Commit to multi-year support

  • Normalize funding for fundraising, systems, and staff

  • Trust lived experience as expertise

  • Shift power, not just language

Because Queer organizations don’t need to prove their worth again. We need funders willing to match rhetoric with resources.

That’s That On That

Stop asking organizations to perform impact while starving their infrastructure.

Stop celebrating resilience while funding scarcity.

Stop calling it partnership if all the risk sits on one side.

If philanthropy truly wants impact, equity, and innovation, then it’s time to fund the conditions that make them possible.

Stability is not optional. Infrastructure is not indulgent. And accountability starts with the check.

Sincerely,

Queers

Queer For Hire provides fundraising support to Queer nonprofits, LGBTQIA+ cultural competency to straight-led organizations and corporations, and individual coaching for Queer professionals.

Learn about our Fundraising Services <here> – we’ll lead or support your fundraising efforts, whether you need general support or want to focus on raising money from and for the LGBTQIA+ community.

Learn about our Fundraising Trainings <here> – we can coach your board, staff, and fundraising team on how to fundraise and how to engage LGBTQIA+ donors.

Learn about our other services <here> or our resources <here>.

Previous
Previous

Why “Resilience” Has Become a Red Flag in Queer Philanthropy

Next
Next

Belonging Is the Intervention: What Education Reform Must Learn from Marginalized Youth